Justine Triet

A lawyer discusses the inconclusive autopsy report with his client, who is suspected of her husband's murder. They analyze the physical evidence and potential scenarios, including the possibility of suicide or an accidental fall, while the client maintains her innocence.

A student interviews a writer about her creative process, specifically the blurred lines between truth and fiction in her work. The conversation becomes increasingly tense as the writer's personal life, including a recent accident, is brought into question, all while her husband's loud music and work disrupt the interview.

A lawyer explains the forensic inconsistencies of a fatal fall to his client, who is the primary suspect in her husband's death. As they review the blood spatter patterns and autopsy reports, the legal strategy shifts toward a suicide defense, forcing the widow to confront the grim reality of her situation.

A blind boy, Daniel, is questioned in court about the day his father died. The judge and prosecutor press him on his memory of his parents' argument and his movements, challenging his perception and the reliability of his testimony.

Sandra, a writer, is reunited with her lawyer, Vincent, after the death of her husband. She recounts the events of the day her husband died, as Vincent begins to question her account in preparation for her defense.

A lawyer questions a woman about her husband's death, which occurred after he fell from their attic window. The lawyer meticulously inspects the scene, probing for details about the husband's work habits and the circumstances surrounding his fall, while the woman provides cautious answers.