Tv
monologue
Comedy-Drama

I'm Wasted, Okay?! I'm Completely Baked!

from The Newsroom

Written by Aaron Sorkin

The Newsroom

Will admits to Mackenzie that he is high on marijuana just as a massive news story breaks, insisting he is still capable of going on air.

Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

Rehearse on your terms

Take this monologue into rehearsal and work through it at your own pace.

Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

WILL: I’M WASTED, OKAY?! I’M COMPLETELY BAKED!

MACKENZIE

What? WILL: I had--okay--listen--shh--

MACKENZIE

Oh no. WILL: No no, it’s okay.

End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

Found your next scene? Make it yours.

Start your free trial and read I'm Wasted, Okay?! I'm Completely Baked! in full, with access to 4,000+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

  • Read the full scene and explore the library
  • Download your script in a clean, printable format
  • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
Casting Types
Get Feedback
Coming Soon

Want expert coaching on this scene?

Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

Find a Coach

Need representation?

Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

Scene Notes & Audition Tips

5 sections
About This Scene

This dynamic monologue from the acclaimed series *The Newsroom* captures a high-stakes, comedic-drama moment. The character of Will, a prominent news anchor, finds himself in an incredibly challenging position: he is under the influence of marijuana just as an urgent, massive news story breaks. The scene revolves around his increasingly frantic attempts to convince his executive producer, Mackenzie, and perhaps himself, that he is perfectly capable of delivering the news live on air despite being "completely baked." It’s a rapid-fire exchange filled with both humor and underlying tension, showcasing a character grappling with professionalism, personal choices, and the immense pressure of live television journalism.

Character Analysis

Will is presented as a highly intelligent, articulate individual whose verbal dexterity usually serves him well in his demanding profession. In this scene, however, his usual composure is hilariously undermined by his intoxicated state, leading to a cascade of logical (and illogical) justifications and non-sequiturs. Despite his impairment, his core drive to report crucial news remains strong, demonstrating a deep commitment to his work even amidst personal chaos. This creates a compelling dichotomy: a highly competent professional momentarily stripped of his usual control, yet fiercely determined to perform his duty.

Why This Works for Auditions

This monologue is an excellent choice for auditions because it showcases a broad range of acting skills within a short timeframe. It demands quick comedic timing, the ability to play multiple emotional layers simultaneously (panic, conviction, slight delusion), and mastery of fast-paced, Sorkin-esque dialogue. Actors can demonstrate vulnerability, defiance, and a strong professional drive, all while portraying an altered state of consciousness without resorting to caricature. The rapid shifts in tone and thought allow a performer to highlight their versatility and command of complex material.

Best Suited For

This scene is particularly well-suited for male actors in the 35-45 age range who are looking to showcase their comedic and dramatic chops. It's ideal for those targeting "Leading Man" or "Young Professional" casting types, especially for roles that require a quick wit, intellectual intensity, or an authoritative yet vulnerable presence. The monologue’s contemporary setting and "high stakes" workplace environment also make it excellent for auditions for modern television dramas or comedies with an edge. It is a strong piece for general practice, self-tapes, or agent showcases.

Performance Tips

When approaching this monologue, focus on Will’s desperate attempt to maintain control and articulate his thoughts, even as his mind races and wanders. The key is to convey the character’s internal conflict between his impaired state and his professional integrity. Pay close attention to the rhythm and cadence of the dialogue, as Sorkin’s writing is highly musical; aim for a quick, almost breathless delivery, but ensure clarity. Don't play "drunk"; instead, play the effort of *trying* to be sober and professional while under the influence. The humor arises from the character’s earnest attempts to convince Mackenzie despite his obvious impairment, rather than from overt physical comedy.

Explore this topic