Skip to content
    Tv
    duologue
    Drama
    Thriller

    Nate and Annalise - The Long Con

    from How to Get Away with Murder

    Written by Pete Nowalk

    How to Get Away with Murder

    Nate confronts Annalise about her manipulation after she forces him to lie under oath, questioning if their entire relationship was a calculated lie.

    Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

    Rehearse this scene
    Rehearse on your terms

    Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

    Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

    ANNALISE

    Tom's inside.

    NATE

    Good. Maybe he'll catch us. You wouldn't mind that though, right? You were all ready to out us today in that courtroom anyway...

    ANNALISE

    I would never have done that.

    NATE

    No. You just wanted to threaten me with it.

    ANNALISE

    Nate...

    End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

    7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

    Found your next scene? Make it yours.

    Start your free trial and read Nate and Annalise - The Long Con in full, with access to 5,500+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

    • Read the full scene and explore the library
    • Download your script in a clean, printable format
    • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
    Casting Types
    Get Feedback
    Coming Soon

    Want expert coaching on this scene?

    Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

    Find a Coach

    Need representation?

    Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

    Scene Notes & Audition Tips

    5 sections
    About This Scene

    Written by Pete Nowalk for the Emmy-winning drama How to Get Away with Murder, this intense contemporary duologue captures a volatile confrontation between Annalise and Nate. Having been forced to compromise his career and lie under oath, Nate corners Annalise outside her home, demanding to know if their entire romantic involvement was merely a calculated manipulation. The scene operates at a high emotional frequency, balancing intimate romance with devastating professional betrayal.

    Character Analysis

    Annalise is an astute lawyer who maintains remarkable poise and command under pressure, refusing to show fear even when physically threatened. She navigates high-stakes confrontations with surgical precision, offering subtle emotional affirmations while firmly reclaiming authority. Nate is a detective pushed beyond his breaking point, torn between fierce resentment and deep lingering affection. His actions burst with raw fury and desperation, driven by the realization that his professional integrity and personal trust have been compromised.

    Why This Works for Auditions

    This scene offers two distinct, fully realized roles that showcase sharp emotional contrast and explosive dramatic tension. For actors reading Annalise, it demonstrates stillness, power, and layered subtext beneath a calm, cool exterior. For actors reading Nate, it serves as a powerful display of righteous anger, physical urgency, and genuine heartbreak. Running roughly two minutes, the exchange provides casting directors with an immediate look at chemistry, pacing, and dramatic maturity.

    Best Suited For

    This piece is ideal for mature performers in their thirties and forties auditioning for leading dramatic roles. It strongly fits casting types such as lawyers, detectives, and morally complex romantic leads preparing agent showcases or dramatic self-tapes. Actors seeking challenging scene-study material centered on power struggles, infidelity, and complex emotional manipulation will also benefit immensely from working this piece.

    Performance Tips

    Avoid letting the argument devolve into pure shouting, as the conflict must remain grounded in the genuine history between the characters. Annalise must weaponize stillness and vocal control rather than matching Nate's volume, which makes her quiet responses far more lethal. Nate should let his physical desperation stem from profound hurt rather than generic hostility, giving his anger authentic emotional weight. Keep the physical proximity dangerous, and allow the charged silence after his outburst to land completely before responding.

    No ratings yet
    Sign in to rate