Skip to content
    Play
    duologue
    Drama

    Stephen and Roger Argue Over the Figure

    from Precisely

    Written by Harold Pinter

    2 min · 2 characters · Any gender · 45-55

    Two high-level officials discuss the 'acceptable' number of casualties in a nuclear strike, revealing a chilling disregard for human life.

    Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

    Rehearse this scene
    Rehearse on your terms

    Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

    Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

    STEPHEN

    I mean, we’ve said it time and time again, haven’t we?

    ROGER

    Of course we have.

    STEPHEN

    Time and time again. Twenty million. That’s what we’ve said. Time and time again. It’s a figure supported by facts. We’ve done our homework. Twenty million is a fact. When these people say thirty I’ll tell you exactly what they’re doing – they’re distorting…

    End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

    7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

    Found your next scene? Make it yours.

    Start your free trial and read Stephen and Roger Argue Over the Figure in full, with access to 7,500+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

    • Read the full scene and explore the library
    • Download your script in a clean, printable format
    • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
    Casting Types
    Get Feedback
    Coming Soon

    Want expert coaching on this scene?

    Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

    Find a Coach

    Need representation?

    Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

    Scene Notes & Audition Tips

    5 sections
    About This Scene

    Written by Harold Pinter, this contemporary two-minute duologue from the play Precisely features two high-level officials casually debating casualty figures for a nuclear strike over drinks. Stephen and Roger fixate on statistical projections and public relations rather than the catastrophic reality of war, expressing intense irritation toward opponents who challenge their calculations. The conversation balances an understated, polished exterior with a chilling cynicism regarding political power, bureaucracy, and human life.

    Character Analysis

    Stephen and Roger operate as sophisticated authority figures entrenched in elite bureaucratic institutions. Stephen takes the rhetorical lead, fiercely defending the government's established numbers with righteous indignation and an escalating hostility toward those who contradict him. Roger acts as an agreeable yet calculating partner, matching Stephen's cynical worldview while dropping in fresh rumors to stoke his colleague's outrage. Both characters demonstrate a complete detachment from basic human empathy, viewing mass slaughter merely as an administrative metric to manage.

    Why This Works for Auditions

    This scene provides an exceptional workout in subtext, rhythm, and dark political satire. Because the horror is framed within mundane professional banter, actors must generate high stakes through precision, pacing, and controlled tension rather than overt melodrama. Its compact duration and balanced dialogue make it an impactful showcase for performers looking to demonstrate vocal control, sharp comedic timing, and an ability to project understated villainy.

    Best Suited For

    The duologue is well suited for actors playing in the 45 to 55 age bracket who fit authority figure, business executive, or villain casting profiles. It serves as an ideal selection for drama school auditions, agent showcases, and general scene study practice where two performers wish to highlight their chemistry and command of modern dramatic text.

    Performance Tips

    Resist the urge to play these characters as cartoonish monsters; their chilling effect relies entirely on treating unthinkable devastation as everyday office administration. Pay careful attention to the rhythm and silences within the dialogue, using the physical beats of drinking to punctuate shifting power dynamics. Keep the vocal delivery refined and composed, allowing the horrific extremity of the discussion to emerge naturally through crisp, matter-of-fact delivery.

    No ratings yet
    Sign in to rate