The Justification of Conventionality

This monologue, "The Justification of Conventionality" from Brieux's *Three Plays*, presents a powerful dramatic piece for actors. It features a single speaker delivering a profound intellectual critique of societal norms and the ingrained human fear of non-conformity. The text delves into the philosophical underpinnings of bourgeois morality, exploring why people cling to shared illusions rather than embracing inconvenient truths.

The speaker in this monologue is an incisive, intellectual individual, likely in their 30s to 60s, who possesses a deep understanding of human psychology and social structures. They are not merely observing but dissecting, presenting their arguments with a critical, almost scathing tone. This character is an authority figure, perhaps a philosopher or a politician, who challenges the listener to confront uncomfortable truths about conformity and the fear of disorienting ideas.

This monologue excels in auditions because it showcases an actor’s ability to handle complex language and convey deep thought. Its analytical and philosophical nature allows for a display of intellectual prowess and the nuanced delivery of a critical perspective. The sustained argument provides an excellent opportunity to demonstrate vocal control, pacing, and the capability to build a compelling dramatic arc within a single speech, all without needing a scene partner.

This monologue is particularly well-suited for actors aiming for drama school auditions, general practice, or competitions where a sophisticated and thought-provoking piece is required. It is an excellent choice for those who are cast as authority figures, professors, or politicians, as it demands an intellectual gravitas and commanding presence. Actors with a character actor sensibility will also find rich ground here to explore the detailed psychological landscape of the speaker.

When performing this piece, focus on embodying the speaker's intellectual rigor and critical perspective. Pay close attention to vocal variety to distinguish between the historical anecdote, the general observations, and the speaker’s own philosophical conclusions. Allow the analytical tone to guide your delivery, but ensure there is an underlying passion or conviction in the speaker’s critique, rather than a dry recitation. Embrace the philosophical underpinnings to create a performance that is both intellectually stimulating and emotionally resonant.