Film
duologue
Drama
Thriller

The Price of Loyalty

from Ides of March

Written by George Clooney, Grant Heslov, Beau Willimon

Ides of March

Paul confronts Stephen about his secret meeting with the opposition, emphasizing that loyalty is the only currency he values before firing him.

Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

Rehearse this scene
Rehearse on your terms

Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

PAUL

No Stephen. You didn't make a mistake. You made a choice. You called me and left a message to call back...that it was important. But when I did...you said to forget about it. You chose not to tell me. Why did you make that choice?

STEPHEN

I didn't think it was important.

End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

Found your next scene? Make it yours.

Start your free trial and read The Price of Loyalty in full, with access to 3,000+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

  • Read the full scene and explore the library
  • Download your script in a clean, printable format
  • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
Casting Types
Get Feedback
Coming Soon

Want expert coaching on this scene?

Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

Find a Coach

Need representation?

Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

Scene Notes & Audition Tips

5 sections
About This Scene

This intense duologue from the film *Ides of March* features Paul confronting Stephen in a high-stakes moment of political betrayal. The scene culminates in Paul firing Stephen, driven by a profound emphasis on loyalty as the ultimate currency in their world. It’s a powerful exploration of trust, consequence, and the unforgiving nature of political environments, where personal choices carry significant professional repercussions. The tension builds as Paul meticulously dissects Stephen's actions, leaving no room for excuses.

Character Analysis

Paul is depicted as a seasoned political operative, aged 40s-50s, embodying the role of an authority figure or mentor who lives by a strict code of loyalty. He is intelligent, strategic, and deeply principled, viewing Stephen's secret meeting as a fundamental breach of trust rather than a mere mistake. Stephen, a young professional in his 20s-30s, is initially defensive but quickly finds himself exposed under Paul's scrutiny. He represents the ambitious but perhaps naive newcomer, whose curiosity and desire for validation lead him down a path of betrayal, ultimately costing him his position.

Why This Works for Auditions

This scene offers superb material for auditions due to its clear dramatic arc and intense emotional core. It provides actors with the opportunity to showcase a wide range of emotions, from Paul's controlled disappointment and steely resolve to Stephen's initial defensiveness and eventual realization of his grave error. The power dynamic is sharply defined, allowing actors to demonstrate their ability to navigate complex character relationships and deliver compelling, character-driven performances. The contemporary setting and relatable themes of betrayal and professional consequence make it highly resonant.

Best Suited For

This duologue is exceptionally well-suited for actors aiming for drama school auditions, agent showcases, or self-tapes where demonstrating dramatic range and intensity is key. The roles are ideal for actors who can portray a commanding, perhaps jaded, authority figure (Paul) or an ambitious yet flawed young professional (Stephen). Its themes of politics, loyalty, and confrontation make it particularly strong for those interested in complex character work, fitting casting types such as Business Executive, Mentor, Young Professional, and actors capable of portraying intense emotional states.

Performance Tips

For Paul, focus on the weight of his experience and the deep-seated belief in loyalty that underpins his actions; his anger is precise and principled, not unhinged. For Stephen, explore the nuance of his initial justification and the dawning realization of the irreversible damage he has caused, allowing for moments of vulnerability and regret to surface without becoming overly melodramatic. Both actors should pay close attention to the subtext and the shifting power dynamics, ensuring that every line serves to escalate the confrontation and underscore the gravity of the situation. Remember that the "firing" is a critical beat requiring careful pacing and emotional precision.

Explore this topic