Tv
duologue
Thriller
Drama

Dogman's Testimony to Inspector Ravini

from Ripley

Written by Steven Zaillian, Patricia Highsmith

Ripley

An inspector interrogates a witness who claims to have seen two men, including the victim, leaning against a car in Rome in the middle of the night.

Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

Rehearse this scene
Rehearse on your terms

Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

DOGMAN

I read the newspapers and realized I may have seen him.

INSP. RAVINI

Where.

DOGMAN

Via di Monserrato.

INSP. RAVINI

What time.

DOGMAN

Around midnight. It’s not the right time. At least not according to what Richard Greenleaf told Ravini.

End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

Found your next scene? Make it yours.

Start your free trial and read Dogman's Testimony to Inspector Ravini in full, with access to 4,000+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

  • Read the full scene and explore the library
  • Download your script in a clean, printable format
  • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
Casting Types
Get Feedback
Coming Soon

Want expert coaching on this scene?

Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

Find a Coach

Need representation?

Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

Scene Notes & Audition Tips

5 sections
About This Scene

This intense duologue from the television series *Ripley* thrusts an actor into the role of Dogman, an interrogated witness, opposite Inspector Ravini. Set in contemporary Rome, the scene unfolds as Dogman recounts a late-night sighting that he now believes is connected to a crime, offering his testimony to a skeptical and sharp inspector. The underlying tension stems from Dogman's potentially crucial, yet vague, observations and Ravini's professional mistrust, creating a cat-and-mouse dynamic even as Dogman claims to be helpful. This interrogation piece is a masterclass in controlled suspense and subtle power dynamics.

Character Analysis

Dogman is a working-class individual, likely in his 40s-60s, who finds himself unexpectedly drawn into a police investigation. He appears uncomfortable in the police station, hinting at a possible past fraught with law enforcement encounters, perhaps even as a suspect himself. His dialogue suggests an attempt to be cooperative, but also a degree of evasiveness or genuine uncertainty regarding key details, perhaps motivated by fear, memory gaps, or a desire to avoid further entanglement. Inspector Ravini, in contrast, is an astute and relentless authority figure, 40s-50s, whose primary objective is to extract verifiable facts, viewing Dogman's every word through a lens of suspicion.

Why This Works for Auditions

This scene offers superb material for actors aiming to showcase nuanced performances. The high stakes of an interrogation combined with the subtle push-and-pull between Dogman and Ravini allow for a compelling display of character, subtext, and reaction. Dogman's character provides ample opportunity to explore vulnerability, guardedness, and a struggle for credibility, without resorting to overt histrionics. For actors seeking to demonstrate their ability to embody a grounded, realistic character under pressure, this scene is particularly effective.

Best Suited For

This duologue is exceptionally well-suited for male actors aged 55+, though the character's age range extends to 40s-60s, making it versatile. It's ideal for those castable as a character actor, working-class type, or anyone portraying a witness or potential suspect. The intensity and mystery elements make it perfect for agent-showcase, self-tape submissions, or general practice to hone character-driven performances. Actors who excel at conveying internal conflict and subtle defensiveness will find this scene a powerful vehicle for their talents.

Performance Tips

When approaching Dogman, focus on grounding his discomfort and the underlying reasons for his vague answers. Consider his physical tells – perhaps an inability to meet Ravini’s gaze, fidgeting, or a slight tremor in his voice – that betray his unease. Explore the balance between wanting to help and perhaps wanting to protect himself or avoid deeper involvement. His casual references, like his dog's kidney condition, can be played with a natural, almost rambling quality that juxtaposes with the starkness of the interrogation. Maintain the sense of heightened stakes and the constant pressure from Ravini, letting that tension inform every line and unspoken beat.

Explore this topic