Skip to content
    Film
    duologue
    Sci-Fi

    Nathan's Justification

    from Ex Machina

    Oscar WinnerBAFTA Winner

    Written by Alex Garland

    Ex Machina

    4 min · 2 characters · Male · 30s-40s

    Caleb confronts Nathan about the ethics and intentions behind giving the AI Ava a gender and sexuality. Nathan challenges Caleb's understanding of consciousness and attraction, suggesting that Caleb's own preferences are as 'programmed' as the machine he is testing.

    Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

    Rehearse this scene
    Rehearse on your terms

    Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

    Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

    CALEB

    Tell me.

    NATHAN

    Sure.

    CALEB

    Why did you give her sexuality? An AI doesn’t need a gender. She could have been a grey box.

    NATHAN

    Actually, I’m not sure that’s true. Can you think of an example of consciousness, at any level, human or animal, that exists without a sexual dimension?

    CALEB

    They have sexuality as an evolutionary reproductive need.

    End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

    7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

    Found your next scene? Make it yours.

    Start your free trial and read Nathan's Justification in full, with access to 8,000+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

    • Read the full scene and explore the library
    • Download your script in a clean, printable format
    • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
    Casting Types
    Get Feedback
    Coming Soon

    Want expert coaching on this scene?

    Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

    Find a Coach

    Need representation?

    Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

    Scene Notes & Audition Tips

    5 sections
    About This Scene

    Written by Alex Garland for the contemporary sci-fi film Ex Machina, this tense duologue captures an intense philosophical confrontation between Caleb and Nathan. Caleb questions the ethical choices behind giving gender and physical intimacy to a synthetic creation, prompting Nathan to dismantle his guest's intellectual certainty. The exchange quickly evolves from an abstract debate into a provocative psychological interrogation about human desire.

    Character Analysis

    Caleb represents the relatable Everyman who approaches his work with moral caution, analytical focus, and genuine curiosity. While he tries to maintain clinical detachment, his discomfort grows as his private motives and subconscious attractions are laid bare. Nathan is an imposing Scientist and Authority Figure who wields intellectual superiority and casual bluntness to keep others off balance. He exudes fierce confidence, unapologetically manipulating the conversation to expose Caleb's underlying vulnerabilities.

    Why This Works for Auditions

    This piece offers two sharply contrasted roles that demand exceptional control of subtext, pacing, and status play. It provides an ideal showcase for actors who want to demonstrate stillness and psychological intensity without relying on melodrama or high volume. Because the scene revolves around hidden motives and sharp power shifts, casting directors can instantly gauge a performer's ability to listen actively and react with nuanced precision.

    Best Suited For

    This material is ideally matched for self-tape submissions, agent-showcase events, and rigorous general-practice work. It is particularly well tailored for male actors in their 30s to 40s exploring Leading Man, Everyman, Scientist, or intense Authority Figure archetypes. The layered philosophical text allows performers to demonstrate sophisticated dramatic timing and mature screen presence.

    Performance Tips

    Avoid playing the discussion purely as an academic exercise, as the true drama lies in the unspoken gamesmanship between the two men. For the actor playing Caleb, track the progressive loss of your moral high ground and let the audience witness the moment Nathan strikes an emotional nerve. For Nathan, stay grounded and comfortable in your physical space, using quiet pauses to let your provocative questions apply pressure. Keep the vocal delivery conversational and focused on intent rather than theatrics, allowing the camera to catch every subtle change in power.

    No ratings yet
    Sign in to rate