Skip to content
    Film
    duologue
    Comedy-Drama
    Comedy

    The Ice Cream Argument

    from Thank You For Smoking

    Written by Jason Reitman

    Thank You For Smoking

    A lobbyist teaches his young son the art of spin by using a hypothetical argument about ice cream flavors to demonstrate how to win by being right.

    Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

    Rehearse this scene
    Rehearse on your terms

    Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

    Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

    JOEY

    So, what happens when you’re wrong?

    NICK

    No, Joey. I’m never wrong.

    JOEY

    You can’t always be right... Right?

    NICK

    If it’s your job to be right. Then, you’re never wrong.

    JOEY

    But, what if you are wrong?

    End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

    7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

    Found your next scene? Make it yours.

    Start your free trial and read The Ice Cream Argument in full, with access to 5,500+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

    • Read the full scene and explore the library
    • Download your script in a clean, printable format
    • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
    Casting Types
    Get Feedback
    Coming Soon

    Want expert coaching on this scene?

    Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

    Find a Coach

    Need representation?

    Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

    Scene Notes & Audition Tips

    5 sections
    About This Scene

    This contemporary duologue from the film *Thank You For Smoking* presents a wonderfully quirky and insightful exchange between a father, Nick, and his young son, Joey. The scene centers on Nick’s unique method of teaching Joey about rhetoric and manipulation, using a hypothetical argument about ice cream flavors. It’s a compelling look at the art of persuasion and how arguments can be won, not necessarily by being objectively right, but by reframing the conversation and discrediting the opponent.

    Character Analysis

    Joey, at 10-12 years old, begins this scene with genuine confusion and a desire to understand his father’s complex worldview. He is earnest, initially logical, and represents a natural, uncorrupted perspective. Nick, in his 30s-40s, is the quintessential anti-hero, a charming lobbyist who views every interaction as an opportunity for strategic communication. He is confident, articulate, and completely committed to his cynical philosophy, demonstrating a blend of parental guidance and professional cunning.

    Why This Works for Auditions

    This scene is an excellent choice for auditions because it showcases a dynamic range of intelligence and emotional shifts within a short duration. The fast-paced, witty dialogue allows actors to demonstrate strong comedic timing balanced with nuanced character development. Both roles offer significant opportunities for actors to display their ability to handle complex text, portray distinct perspectives, and navigate a relationship with an underlying power imbalance. It’s a compelling piece that highlights both rhetorical skill and authentic human connection.

    Best Suited For

    This duologue is ideally suited for male actors within the specified age ranges, particularly for those looking to explore father-son dynamics or roles requiring sharp intellect and persuasive delivery. It works exceptionally well for actors targeting roles that fall under casting types like the Leading Man or Anti-Hero, given Nick’s charming yet manipulative nature, or the Everyman who subtly shifts into a teacher figure. The "Under 13" age range for Joey makes this perfect for young actors showcasing their ability to engage with mature themes and intelligent dialogue, while Nick's role is suitable for actors in the Parent category.

    Performance Tips

    For the actor playing Joey, focus on the gradual dawning of understanding and the internal struggle as his youthful idealism confronts his father's cynical lessons. Show the confusion, then the dawning comprehension, and finally, a subtle acceptance or intrigue. For Nick, lean into the confidence and unshakeable conviction of his character, ensuring his teaching moments feel effortless and authoritative. Emphasize his pleasure in the intellectual game, while still maintaining the underlying connection to his son. Both actors should pay close attention to the rhythm of the dialogue, letting the intellectual sparring build in intensity and wit.

    No ratings yet
    Sign in to rate