Film
monologue
Drama
Thriller

The Magic Bullet Theory

from Jfk

Written by Oliver Stone, Zachary Sklar

Jfk

District Attorney Jim Garrison delivers a meticulous courtroom presentation debunking the single-bullet theory to prove a conspiracy.

Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

Rehearse on your terms

Take this monologue into rehearsal and work through it at your own pace.

Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

JIM

A picture speaks a thousand words. Yet sometimes the truth is too simple for some... The Warren Commission thought they had an open and shut case: three bullets, one assassin - but two things happened that made it virtually impossible: 1)the Zapruder film which you just saw, and 2)the third wounded man, Jim Tague, who was nicked by a fragment down by…

End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

Found your next scene? Make it yours.

Start your free trial and read The Magic Bullet Theory in full, with access to 3,000+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

  • Read the full scene and explore the library
  • Download your script in a clean, printable format
  • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
Casting Types
Get Feedback
Coming Soon

Want expert coaching on this scene?

Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

Find a Coach

Need representation?

Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

Scene Notes & Audition Tips

5 sections
About This Scene

This powerful monologue features District Attorney Jim Garrison, a central figure in the dramatic film *JFK*, as he meticulously dismantles the official "single-bullet theory" surrounding President Kennedy's assassination. Delivered in a courtroom setting, Garrison's presentation is an intense and detailed exposé, using logical deduction and physical demonstration to argue against the Warren Commission's findings. The scene builds from initial skepticism to a full, vivid re-enactment of the supposed bullet trajectory, designed to convince the jury of a far-reaching conspiracy.

Character Analysis

Jim Garrison is presented as an intelligent, relentless, and deeply committed individual, driven by a profound sense of justice and a determination to uncover the truth. His character embodies the archetype of an authority figure willing to challenge established narratives. In this monologue, he shifts from a confident, fact-presenting lawyer to a dynamic storyteller, using his body and props to illustrate complex physics in a compelling way. This performance demands an actor capable of conveying both intellectual rigor and impassioned conviction, showcasing a character who is sharp-witted and emotionally resonant.

Why This Works for Auditions

This monologue is an excellent choice for auditions because it showcases an actor's ability to command a space, intellectualize complex information, and build tension dynamically. The legal setting provides a clear objective – to persuade – allowing for a strong performance arc. Its duration of four minutes is ideal for demonstrating stamina and sustained focus, while the intense tone and dramatic stakes offer significant opportunities for an actor to display a wide emotional and intellectual range. The script's clear narrative progression allows for a nuanced, layered performance.

Best Suited For

This monologue is particularly well-suited for male actors in the 35-45 age range who can embody a Leading Man, Lawyer, or Authority Figure casting type. It's an exceptional piece for a drama school audition, agent showcase, or a self-tape where an actor wants to display gravitas, intelligence, and a commanding presence. Actors seeking roles that require intensity, logical reasoning, and a strong sense of purpose will find this a compelling choice, especially those comfortable with direct address and a more formal, persuasive style.

Performance Tips

Focus on clarity and precision when delivering Garrison's arguments; every word must land with purpose. Utilize vocal variation to differentiate between presenting facts and building the incredulous "magic bullet" narrative, allowing the shift in tone to underscore the absurdity he's exposing. Consider how physical choices, even without props, can imply the demonstration Garrison is performing, using your body to illustrate trajectories and positions. Maintain direct eye contact with your imagined "jury," inviting them into your logical process and gradually building their conviction in your argument.

Explore this topic