Skip to content
    Film
    duologue
    Drama

    Julius Explains English Libel Law to Deborah Over Lunch

    from Denial

    Written by David Hare

    Denial

    2 min · 2 characters · Any gender · 35-45

    Julius explains the complexities of English libel law to Deborah as they prepare to defend her against a Holocaust denier's lawsuit.

    Start a free 7-day trial — 5 downloads a day, unlimited when Pro begins

    Rehearse this scene
    Rehearse on your terms

    Choose your role and voices for the other characters. Run the scene at your own pace.

    Scene PreviewExcerpt — subscribe to read full scene

    JULIUS

    I have to warn you: there’s a reason Mr Irving is bringing the case in London.

    DEBORAH

    I wondered about that.

    JULIUS

    It gives him an advantage. Over here, if you’re accused of defaming someone, then the burden of proof lies with the accuser. It’s up to them to prove what you said was untrue. In England it’s the other way round. It’s up to the…

    End of preview. Continue with Pro below.

    7 days freeYour next rehearsal starts here

    Found your next scene? Make it yours.

    Start your free trial and read Julius Explains English Libel Law to Deborah Over Lunch in full, with access to 7,500+ monologues and scenes to explore next.

    • Read the full scene and explore the library
    • Download your script in a clean, printable format
    • Take it into rehearsal with the Script Reader
    Casting Types
    Get Feedback
    Coming Soon

    Want expert coaching on this scene?

    Browse our curated list of acting coaches, dialect specialists, and more.

    Find a Coach

    Need representation?

    Browse verified agents and casting directors in our directory.

    Scene Notes & Audition Tips

    5 sections
    About This Scene

    Written by David Hare for the film Denial, this two-minute dramatic duologue takes place between Julius and Deborah over lunch in a restaurant. Julius lays out the reality of English libel law, explaining why their adversary has brought the defamation lawsuit in London where the burden of proof rests on the defense. As Deborah struggles with a legal system that seems contrary to natural justice, the conversation shifts into tactical assessment. The scene establishes the legal gravity of defending historical truth against a Holocaust denier and marks the start of a formidable legal partnership.

    Character Analysis

    Julius is a sophisticated, shrewd legal mind who communicates complex realities with understated authority and calm reassurance. He approaches the law with strategic poise, balancing technical clarity with genuine respect for Deborah by waiving his firm's legal fees. Deborah is an intense, formidable intellectual whose fierce commitment to truth is matched by thorough research. Her reaction to British jurisprudence is one of sharp moral indignation, yet she remains acutely observant, articulate, and prepared to engage.

    Why This Works for Auditions

    This piece serves as an exceptional showcase for actors seeking grounded, dialogue-driven drama that relies on intellect and subtext rather than overt theatricality. Both characters maintain clear objectives: Julius tests his client's resolve while managing her expectations, and Deborah probes the realities of an unfamiliar legal battle. The exchange flows with sharp pacing, offering auditioning performers strong opportunities to demonstrate active listening, status play, and restrained emotional intensity.

    Best Suited For

    This scene is ideal for performers in the 35 to 45 age range seeking material for drama school auditions, agent showcases, self-tapes, or general practice. It particularly suits actors casting as lawyers, academics, or sophisticated, intense leading performers who excel with cerebral, high-stakes material.

    Performance Tips

    Resist the urge to play the scene with overt anger or grandstanding; the strength of the writing lies in quiet confidence and naturalism. Julius should deliver the procedural information with casual mastery rather than lecturing, while Deborah must balance genuine shock with quick intellectual adaptation. Focus on the subtextual evaluation happening between the two characters as they quietly measure each other's strength across the table.

    No ratings yet
    Sign in to rate